(no subject)

[gerbie]

How come it is just not possible to go to bed before one o clock, however much you try?

Comments

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Sigh. I wish I knew.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

It's getting out of hand though. I always went to bed late, but lately 1 seems to be early. 2 is more regular. Luckily I don't have to get up at 7 too often anymore, but 8 is still an annoying time to hear the alarm.

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

I'm in the same situation (six time zones over)

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Which means that by the time my alarm goes, you're thinking: Where did time go, I really should be in bed. Good to know that there is always one of us awake, the world can't escape, we're on duty!

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

And sometimes... BOTH of us are awake. Frightening.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Good thing world leaders don't realise the combined power of us two awake. We would be immediate target for all secret services. We better keep quiet about it.

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

I dreamed last night that I was recruited by some ulta-secret goverment agency for my ability to find especially dangerous criminals by attracting them to me.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

The East German method. I'm afraid I won't be recruited..

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Why?

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

I don't think my looks are tempting enough. Apart from that there are only few female politicians I could try to get some hot info from.

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Pshaw. That's what I have to say to that. I'm not so attractive myself, and yet... the psychos just flock to me.

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Perhaps the psychos are right! Could you be a bit overcritical perhaps? Not exactly objective?

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

I'm precisely as objective as you are!

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

But that are many more male politicians who would tell their secrets to you, than there are female politicians who would fall into my arms..

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Did you read the post? They weren't politicians, they were criminals... anyway... how do you know unless you try?

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

I remember. I just compared the situation to the cold war tactics, usually applied on politicians.

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Ahh... give it a go, anyway.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Wouldn't be fair, would it. If we start using our looks, apart from already using our brain, we'd take over the world in no time.

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Buahahahaha. I'm adding you on Yahoo.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Is that a secret code? The eagle has landed, the goose ate his eggs, I'm adding you on Yahoo?

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

No... I added you as a friend on my Yahoo messenger.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Aha. Now, as honoured as I am by such an action, I can't even remember the last time I used Yahoo messenger...

Does that mean we won't be able to communicate, apart from through LJ-comments in our E-mail?

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Nope... do you use any other messengers?

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Aha... got it. Well, then email it is. Mine's in my userinfo. But you are happily installed in my Yahoo friends list if you ever log in.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

You never use MSN?

Re:

[sarahcarotte.livejournal.com]

Uhuh, I'm generally logged in. My hotmail is the accound linked to my msn id.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Just opened MSN. What do I do next?

[javamental.livejournal.com]

Heh. I appear to have screwed up. In an attempt to clean up my friends list, I switched my journal to a community and back again under the sadly mistaken impression that it would remove all the people who had my journal "friended", whom I had not "friended" back. Instead, it removed everyone who had me "friended".
Ooops.
If you'd still like me on your friends list, you'll need to laugh your ass off at my mistake and then add me back again. *grins* Sorry for the hassle!

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

So this gives me the opportunity to shout at you! And I can't remember exactly which colour it was I had supplied you with on my friends page, so now my whole friends list needs redoing. Someday. I guess.

Re:

[javamental.livejournal.com]

Hmmm, I don't remember, either. Dark brown, maybe?

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

No, that's your new colour. ;-))

Re:

[javamental.livejournal.com]

Cool. I seemed to remember someone having me as dark brown.

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

I really wouldn't have a clue what colour other people have given me. Once every so many months I redo all the colours. With all the adding and deleting it is messed up by then.

[harns.livejournal.com]

Omdat je niet in verleiding wordt gebracht :-)

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Dat zal het zijn. Maar hoe breng ik daar verandering in?

[harns.livejournal.com]

Als ik het wist zou ik het zeggen....Vraag het niet aan iemand die (bijna) alle uitnodigingen van mannen afslaat...

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Omdat?

Re:

[harns.livejournal.com]

Ze bang is misschien???
Een avond naar de film, of uit eten...dat geeft iemand de kans dichterbij mij te komen...dat sta ik niet zomaar toe.
Laat staan dat iemand mij tot het bed verleidt...het zou heerlijk zijn (krijg jij met dit weer geen last van je hormonen dan??) maar niet zonder gevoelens van oprechte warmte..dan heb ik het niet eens over eeuwig blijvende liefde..

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Maar als je je niet kwetsbaar durft op te stellen, dan heb je dus ook maar een keuze, accepteren dat je voorlopig alleen blijft.

Re:

[harns.livejournal.com]

Fijn vooruitzicht, vind je niet?

Re:

[gerbie.livejournal.com]

Het is een of het ander. Ik kan het een accepteren, probeer het andere soms. Maar beide uitsluiten is onmogelijk.